Blog

Dec 062012

Gov's goal puts housing, growth on front burner
by Rus Lodi

Governor Patrick put the issue of housing supply and job growth on the front burner last month when he announced a statewide goal of producing 10,000 multifamily units per year for each of the next three years. Speaking on Nov. 13 at a state housing conference in Worcester, Patrick said the goal of keeping young professionals and working familes in Massachusetts hinges on creating more multifamily housing.

To spark this effort, Patrick outlined a new Compact Neighborhoods Program, which is designed to offer incentives to communities that build denser, multifamily housing. The program is meant to complemennt other state initiatives like Ch. 40R which promote mulitfamily housing near jobs, public transportation and urban centers.

One week later, Boston Globe op-ed contributor Paul McMorrow wrote that in order for the Patrick Administration to achieve its ambitious goals, it must convince cities and towns to overcome their resistance to housing and realize the importance of balancing housing supply and demand. Otherwise, he predicts communities won't take advantage of the various programs that provide incentives for multifamily housing.

MHP's Foundation for Growth initiative was created to tackle this problem. Our objective is to enable more robust job growth through state polices that require responsible land use planning and eliminate unreasonable local constraints on housing supply. Governor Patrick's aggressive goal is right on target and it brings the issue of housing and economic growth to the forefront. McMorrow's candid political assessment highlights the need for new state polices to get us there.  

 

Back to List

Leave a Comment

Respect…
Your personal information will never be shared and your email address will not appear on this site.

Recent Blogs


Recent Comments

Another data source to look at in terms of tracking the “movers” is the American Community Survey 2012 Public Use Microdata Sample. I recently looked at this data to determine who…
— Tim H. Davis | July 15, 2014
Once again, Professor Glaeser has clearly and correctly hit the nail on the head. Over regulation and many unnecessary restrictions on development are the main reasons we are still…
— Judy Jenkins | October 15, 2009
I wonder if part of the research agenda could explore the following questions. What would have happened to Massachusetts home prices over the past two years had we built more…
— Joe Kriesberg | October 8, 2009
As a REALTOR, developer, and community activist, I would say that Michael Goodman's comment hits the nail on the head. In Medway, the only residential property that can be…
— Paul G. Yorkis | October 8, 2009
The issue may be less about growth and more about housing affordability and tenure options that can enhance economic competitiveness. Rather than looking West and South, perhaps we…
— Nicolas P. Retsinas | October 2, 2009