Blog

Dec 162011

The case for regional funding of public transit
by By Rus Lodi

MBTA_trainMassInc’s recent report on new funding strategies for transportation makes the case for overhauling how we fund public transportation.

Written by Ben Forman, Dan Darcy and James Emilio, the report warns that continuing to fund public transportation via sales tax revenues will ensure that the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) will continue to run up large deficits and will continue to get a disproportionate share of state revenues, thereby preventing Regional Transit Authorities from making the necessary investments they need to improve their public transportation systems.

The report proposes that a regional payroll tax or a tax on miles driven would enable the MBTA to close its operating deficit and make necessary improvements while generating increased revenues so that Gateway Cities could invest more funds in public transportation.

Financing transportation regionally gives strong incentives to work to align their regional planning and land use decisions to maximize the economic impact of these investments.

Right now, the report argues, increased spending for transportation is a non-starter because much of the state resents the fact that most of public transit dollars go to Boston. The report says shifting to a regional approach would be better.

The report warns that failing to address how to adequately fund transportation could stunt our economic growth and recovery. The report notes that between 1980 and 2010, per capita income in Greater Boston grew 1.8 times faster than in metro areas nationally. And while Boston is the nation’s 10th largest metro area, the region has the nation’s fifth largest transit system, measured by ridership.

The T was an asset that supported the region’s economic success but it did not benefit from this success in terms of capturing the revenue needed to sustain and grow its operations.

…it is increasingly clear that unsustainable finances imperil the MBTA’s ability to continue to buttress regional economic growth.

With a regional approach to funding, the report argues that the MBTA would have the resources to keep pace with economic growth and Gateway Cities would have the assets to support its own economic growth.

Stronger service in communities like Brockton and Lowell could make the broader regional economy more productive.

An executive summary and the full report can be found on the MassInc web site

 

   

Back to List

Leave a Comment

Respect…
Your personal information will never be shared and your email address will not appear on this site.

Recent Blogs


Recent Comments

Once again, Professor Glaeser has clearly and correctly hit the nail on the head. Over regulation and many unnecessary restrictions on development are the main reasons we are still…
— Judy Jenkins | October 15, 2009
I wonder if part of the research agenda could explore the following questions. What would have happened to Massachusetts home prices over the past two years had we built more…
— Joe Kriesberg | October 8, 2009
As a REALTOR, developer, and community activist, I would say that Michael Goodman's comment hits the nail on the head. In Medway, the only residential property that can be…
— Paul G. Yorkis | October 8, 2009
The issue may be less about growth and more about housing affordability and tenure options that can enhance economic competitiveness. Rather than looking West and South, perhaps we…
— Nicolas P. Retsinas | October 2, 2009
Clark, I agree that the Commonwealth is in no danger of becoming anything like Phoenix (or Las Vegas or Southern California and Florida for that matter) and that there is strong…
— Mike Goodman | September 29, 2009